Delaware 2002 Orthophotography

Metadata:


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: EarthData International of Maryland, LLC
Publication_Date: 20030200
Publication_Time: Unknown
Title: Delaware 2002 Orthophotography
Edition: 1st Edition
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Gaithersburg, Maryland
Publisher: EarthData International of Maryland, LLC
Description:
Abstract:
This metadata record describes the production of false color infrared digital orthophotography at a scale of 2,400 of the State of Delaware by EarthData International of Maryland, LLC.
Purpose:
This false color IR digital orthophotography was produced for the State of Delaware for the purpose of statewide base mapping.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 20020300
Beginning_Time: unknown
Ending_Date: 20030300
Ending_Time: unknown
Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -75.021696
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -75.811113
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 39.879036
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 38.403839
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: Remote Sensing
Theme_Keyword: Aerial Photography
Theme_Keyword: Digital Orthophotography
Theme_Keyword: False Color Infrared (FCIR)
Theme_Keyword: Leaf-Off Photography
Theme_Keyword: imagery
Theme_Keyword: DOQ
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ArcIMS Metadata Server Theme Codes
Theme_Keyword: imageryBaseMapsEarthCover
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Place_Keyword: Delaware
Place_Keyword: Kent County (10001)
Place_Keyword: New Castle County (10003)
Place_Keyword: Sussex County (10005)
Access_Constraints: contact maintainer
Use_Constraints: contact maintainer
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: EarthData International of Maryland
Contact_Person: Raquel Charrois
Contact_Position: Project Manager
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 45 West Watkins Mill Rd
City: Gaithersburg
State_or_Province: MD
Postal_Code: 20878
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 301-948-8550
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 301-963-2064
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: metadata@earthdata.com
Hours_of_Service: 9:00-5:00 M-F
Browse_Graphic:
Browse_Graphic_File_Name: <http://datamil.udel.edu/browsegraphics/de2002orthos.jpg>
Browse_Graphic_File_Type: JPEG

Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
This data has been produced to be fully compliant with NSSDA Standards for mapping at a scale of 1 / 2,400.
Logical_Consistency_Report:
Compliance with the accuracy standard was ensured by the placement of GPS ground control prior to the acquisition of aerial photography. The following checks were performed. 1. The ground control and airborne GPS data stream were validated through a fully analytical bundle aerotriangulation adjustment. The residuals of the adjustment met the required standards for accuracy which are 1 part in 10,000 of the flying height for the horizontal position (X and Y) and 1 part in 9,000 or better of the flying height in elevation (Z). 2. The DTM data was checked against the project control. The technician visited and confirmed the accuracy of the project mass points during initial compilation. 3. Digital orthophotography was validated through an inspection of edge matching and visual inspection for image quality.
Completeness_Report:
The following software is used for validation of the 1. Aerotriangulation - ISBBA 2. DTM data - Z/I Imaging SSK 3. Digital Orthophotography - Z/I Imaging OrthoPro
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
The digital orthophotos fully comply with NSSDA standards for production of orthophotos at a horizontal scale of 1 / 2,400 with a ground pixel resolution of 1 foot.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Waterway Surveys and Engineering LTD
Publication_Date: 20020300
Publication_Time: Unknown
Title: GPS Photo Control Survey for the State of Delaware.
Edition: 1st
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: model
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Publisher: Waterway Survey and Engineering
Source_Scale_Denominator: 21,600
Type_of_Source_Media: CD-ROM
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 20020306
Beginning_Time: unknown
Ending_Date: 20020310
Ending_Time: unknown
Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: GPS Ground Control
Source_Contribution:
Ground control was established prior to the acquisition of aerial photography. Under contract to EarthData, Waterways Surveys and Engineering established and monumented with a rod and cap a total of 50 ground control points using GPS techniques for vertical and horizontal coordinate values. Ground control references Delaware State Plane, NAD83(91), NAVD88 (GEOID99) both in meters.
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: EarthData Aviation
Publication_Date: 20020300
Publication_Time: Unknown
Title: Aerial Imagery Acquisition of the State of Delaware
Edition: 1st
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Hagerstown,MD
Publisher: EarthData Aviations
Source_Scale_Denominator: 21,600
Type_of_Source_Media: filmstrip
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 20020308
Beginning_Time: unknown
Ending_Date: 20020404
Ending_Time: unknown
Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Aerial photography
Source_Contribution:
Aerial photography was acquired using a flight design that included a total of 1196 exposures in 20 North-South oriented flight line. Aerial photography was exposed on Kodak CIR film 1443, emulsion number 1133012. Aerial photography was supplemented with the simultaneous acquisition of airborne GPS data, which captured the ground coordinate for the nadir point of each photograph. Aerial photography was exposed at an altitude of 11,000' above mean terrain yielding an approximate scale of 1 / 21,600.
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Aerial photography was acquired using a flight design that included a total of 1196 exposures in 20 North-South oriented flight line. Aerial photography was exposed on Kodak CIR film 1443, emulsion number 1133012. Aerial photography was supplemented with the simultaneous acquisition of airborne GPS data, which captured the ground coordinate for the nadir point of each photograph. Aerial photography was exposed at an altitude of 11,000' above mean terrain yielding an approximate scale of 1 / 21,600.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: Aerial Photography
Process_Date: 20020303
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: Aerial Photography
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: EarthData International of Maryland
Contact_Person: Raquel Charrois
Contact_Position: Project Manager
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 45 West Watkins Mill Road
City: Gaithersburg
State_or_Province: MD
Postal_Code: 20878
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 301-948-8550
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 301-963-2064
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: metadata@earthdata.com
Hours_of_Service: 9 AM - 5 PM Mon. - Fri.
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The ground control and airborne GPS data was integrated into a rigid network through the completion of a fully analytical bundle aerotriangulation adjustment. 1. The original aerial film was scanned at a resolution of 14 microns. The scans were produced using Z/I Imaging PhotoScan flatbed metric scanners. Each unit has a positional accuracy of 1.5 microns and a radiometric resolution of 1,024 gray levels for each of three color layers. 2. The raster scans were given a preliminary visual check on the scanner workstation to ensure that the raster file size is correct and to verify that the tone and contrast were acceptable. A directory tree structure for the project was established on the each of the workstations, and a new block was created for the first strip of frames to be measured. The criteria used for establishment of the directory structure and file naming conventions were duplicated on all work stations used for the project to avoid confusion or errors due to inconsistencies in digital data. The block was defined using the relevant camera information that was obtained from the USGS camera calibration report for the aerial camera and the date of photography. The raster files were rotated to the correct orientation for mensuration on the softcopy workstation. The rotation of the raster files was necessary to accommodate different flight directions from one strip to the next. The technician verified that the datum and units of measurement for the supplied control were consistent with the project requirements. These units were designated as Delaware State Plane, NAD83 (91) NAVD88 (GEOID 99) both in meters. 3. The photogrammetric technician performed an automatic interior orientation for the frames in the block. The softcopy systems that were used by the technicians have the ability to set up predefined fiducial templates for the aerial camera(s) used for the project. Using the template that was predefined in the block parameter setup, the software identified and measured the eight fiducial positions for all the frames. Upon completion, the results were reviewed against the tolerance threshold. Any problems that occurred during the automatic interior orientation will cause the software to reject the frame and identify it as a potential problem. The operator then had the option to measure the fiducials manually. 4. The operator launched the point selection routine which enabled the operator to select pass and tie points interactively. The correlation tool that is part of the routine identified the same point of contrast selected by the operator and then located the same point on the adjacent frames using autocorrelation techniques. The operator visited these locations and accepted or refined the interpolated locations. The interpolation tool can be turned on and off by the operator depending on the type of land cover in the triangulation block. Factors that influence the settings include the amount of contrast and the sharpness of features present on the photography. The operator set the search pattern in order to ensure that six points were selected in each stereo model. In order to ensure maximum strength of the final bundle adjustment, pass and tie points were transferred across adjacent flight strips. A preliminary adjustment was run to identify pass points that had high residuals. This process was accomplished for each flight line or partial flight line to ensure that the network has sufficient levels of accuracy as the points were selected. The points were visited and the cause for any inaccuracy was identified and rectified. This process also identified any gaps where the point selection routine failed to establish a point. The operator interactively set any missing points. 5. The control and pass point measurement data was exported to ISBBA which was used for the final adjustment. The ISBBA program created a results file with the RMSE results for all points within the block and their relation to one another. The photogrammetrist performing the adjustments used their experience to determine what course of action to take for any point falling outside specifications. 6. The bundle adjustment was run through the ISBBA software several times. The photogrammetrist increased the accuracy parameters for each subsequent iteration so, when the final adjustment was run, the RMSE for the project met the accuracy of 1 part in 10,000 of the flying height for the horizontal position (X and Y) and 1 part in 9,000 or better of the flying height in elevation (Z). The errors were expressed as a natural ratio of the flying height utilizing a one-sigma (95%) confidence level. 7. The accuracy of the final solution was verified by running the final adjustment, placing no constraints on any quality control points. The RMSE values for these points must fall within the tolerances above for the solution to be acceptable. 8. The final ISBBA adjustment generates a .RES file and a .COR file. The .RES file has all the results from the adjustment with the RMSE values for each point measured. The .COR file contains the adjusted X, Y, Z, coordinates for all the measured points.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: Aerotriangulation
Process_Date: 20020900
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: Analytical Aerotriangulation
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: EarthData International of Maryland
Contact_Person: Raquel Charrois
Contact_Position: Project Manager
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 45 West Watkins Mill Road
City: Gaithersburg
State_or_Province: MD
Postal_Code: 20878
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 301-948-8550
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 301-963-2064
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: metadata@earthdata.com
Hours_of_Service: 9 AM - 5 PM Mon. - Fri.
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The following step-by-step procedure was utilized for DEM development . A DEM was the requested deliverable for this project. A DEM is composed of regularly spaced points (X,Y and Z). For the purpose of creating an optimum surface a DTM was created by EarthData. A DTM is composed of random data points (X,Y and Z) and three dimensional breaklines. The relationship of points to breaklines and the density and position of points will vary depending on the complexity and severity of the terrain. Breaklines are collected along the edges of roads, stream banks and centerlines, ridges, and other features where the slope of the terrain changes. The collection methodology being described is for the creation of a DTM. 1. DTM/DEM data was captured in the Z/I SSK, MicroStation environment, which allowed the photogrammetrist to see graphically where each single X, Y, and Z point and any breaklines fall in relation to each other. This unique approach allowed for interactive editing of the point data by the photogrammetrist as the DTM/DEM data was collected. Once this processes was complete, the data was passed to the editing department for quality control and formatting. 2. The cartographic editor performed an accuracy evaluation for each DTM/DEM file. This step was accomplished by a visual inspection of the dataset in profile view to identify spikes or pits in the mass point information. The technician also verified that sufficient overage exists for each file to ensure full coverage for each completed orthophoto. 3. Acceptable DTM/DEM data was used for digital orthophoto production. The DTM/DEM data was converted to ASCII files for delivery. 4. The DTM/DEM data files were imported into the Intergraph MGE environment. The technician set the required project datum and projection and created a TIN (triangulated irregular network).
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: DTM/DEM
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SCAN
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: AT
Process_Date: 20030200
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: DTM/DEM and Digital Orthophoto Creation
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: EarthData International of Maryland
Contact_Person: Raquel Charrois
Contact_Position: Project Manager
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 45 West Watkins Mill Road
City: Gaithersburg
State_or_Province: MD
Postal_Code: 20878
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 301-948-8550
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 301-963-2064
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: metadata@earthdata.com
Hours_of_Service: 9 AM - 5 PM Mon. - Fri.
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The digital orthophotography was produced in False Color Infrared at a scale of 1 / 2,400 with a 1 foot pixel resolution. A step-by-step breakdown of the digital orthophoto production process follows. 1. A representative number of raster image files were visually checked for image quality on the workstation. 2. The digital image files were oriented on the digital orthophoto production workstation. The following information was then loaded onto the workstation. - The camera calibration parameters and flight line direction - Ground control and pass point locations - The exterior orientation parameters from the aerotriangulation process - ASCII file containing the corner coordinates of the orthophotos - The digital elevation model in a DGN format - Project-specific requirements such as final tile size and resolution. -Orientation parameters developed from the aerotriangulation solution. A coordinate transformation based on the camera calibration fiducial coordinates was then undertaken. This transformation allowed the conversion of every measured element of the plates to a sample/line location. Each pixel in an image was then referenced by sample and line (its horizontal and vertical position) and matched to project control. 3. The newly resected image was visually checked for pixel drop-out and/or other artifacts that may degrade the final orthophoto image. 4. DTM data was imported and written to the correct subdirectory on disk. The final digital orthophotos were referenced to Delaware State Plane, NAD83 (91) NAVD88 (GEOID 99) both in meters. 5. The DTM file was re-inspected for missing or erroneous data points. 6. A complete differential rectification was carried out using a cubic convolution algorithm that removed image displacement due to topographic relief, tip and tilt of the aircraft at the moment of exposure, and radial distortion within the camera. Each final orthophoto was produced at a scale of 1 / 2,400 with a 1 foot pixel resolution. At this point in the process, the digital orthophotos covered the full aerial frame. 7. Each digital orthophoto image was visually checked for accuracy on the workstation screen. Selected control points (control panels or photo-identifiable points) that are visible on the original film were visited on the screen, and the X and Y coordinates of the location of the panel or photo-identifiable point were measured. This information was cross-referenced with the X and Y information provided by the original ground survey. If the orthophoto did not meet or exceed NSSDA standards, the rectification was regenerated. The digital orthophotos were then edge-matched using a module of the Z/I OrthoPro and proprietary software packages. Adjoining images were displayed in alternating colors of red and cyan. In areas of exact overlap, the image appears in gray-scale rendition. Offsets were colored red or cyan, depending on the angle of displacement. The operator panned down each overlap line at a map scale to inspect the overlap area. Any offset exceeding accuracy standards was re-rectified after the DTM/DEM and AT information was rechecked. 8. Once the orthophotos were inspected and approved for accuracy, the files were copied to the network and downloaded by the orthophoto finishing department. This production unit was charged with radiometrically correcting the orthophotos prior to completing the mosaicking and clipping of the final tiles. The image processing technician performed a histogram analysis of several images that contained different land forms (urban, agricultural, forested, etc.) and established a histogram that best preserves detail in highlight and shadow areas. EarthData International has developed a proprietary piece of software called "Image Dodging." This radiometric correction algorithm was utilized in batch and interactive modes. Used in this fashion, this routine eliminated density changes due to sun angle and changes in flight direction. A block of images were processed through image dodging, in batch mode and displayed using Z/I OrthoPro, at this point the images have been balanced internally, but there are global differences in color and brightness that were adjusted interactively. The technician assigned correction values for each orthophoto then displayed the corrected files to assess the effectiveness of the adjustment. This process was repeated until the match was considered near seamless. The files then were returned to digital orthophoto production to mosaic the images. 9. The processed images were mosaicked using the Z/I OrthoPro software. The splice lines were set up interactively by the technician and were placed in areas that avoided buildings, bridges, elevated roadways, or other features that would highlight the splice lines. File names were assigned. 10. The finishing department performed final visual checks for orthophoto image quality. The images were inspected using Adobe Photoshop, which enabled the technician to remove dust and lint from the image files interactively. Depending on the size and location of the flaw, Photoshop provided several tools to remove the flaw. Interactive removal of dust were accomplished at high magnification so the repairs are invisible. 11. The final orthophoto images were written out into TIFF format with the corresponding georeference files.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: Digital Orthophotography
Process_Date: Not complete
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: CIR Digital Orthophotography
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: EarthData International of Maryland
Contact_Person: Raquel Charrois
Contact_Position: Project Manager
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 45 West Watkins Mill Road
City: Gaithersburg
State_or_Province: MD
Postal_Code: 20878
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 301-948-8550
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 301-963-2064
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: metadata@earthdata.com
Hours_of_Service: 9 AM - 5 PM Mon. - Fri.
Cloud_Cover: 0

Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Raster

Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Grid_Coordinate_System:
Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: State Plane Coordinate System
State_Plane_Coordinate_System:
SPCS_Zone_Identifier: 3551
Transverse_Mercator:
Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: .999995
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: +038.000000
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: +75.250000
False_Easting: 200000
False_Northing: 0
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: coordinate pair
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 1
Ordinate_Resolution: 1
Planar_Distance_Units: meters
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983 (1991)
Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major_Axis: 6,378,137
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.2572221010
Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Altitude_System_Definition:
Altitude_Datum_Name: North American Vertical Datum of 1988
Altitude_Resolution: 1.09
Altitude_Distance_Units: Meters
Altitude_Encoding_Method: Implicit coordinate

Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Office of State Planning Coordination
Contact_Person: Mike Mahaffie
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
Third Floor Suite 7 Thomas Collins Building. 540 South Dupont Highway
City: Dover
State_or_Province: Delaware
Postal_Code: 19901
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 302-739-3090
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mmahaffie@state.de.us
Hours_of_Service: 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM Mon. - Fri.
Resource_Description: Offline Data
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: TIFF
Format_Information_Content: This data is also availible in a single mosaicked MrSID file.
File_Decompression_Technique: No compression applied
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Offline_Option:
Offline_Media: CD-ROM
Recording_Capacity:
Recording_Density: 600
Recording_Density_Units: Mb
Recording_Format: ISO 9600
Compatibility_Information:
Data is written to master CDs in accordance with ISO standard.
Fees: None

Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20021000
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: EarthData International of Maryland
Contact_Person: Raquel Charrois
Contact_Position: Project Manager
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 45 West Watkins Mill Road
City: Gaithersburg
State_or_Province: MD
Postal_Code: 20878
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 301-948-8550
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 301-963-2064
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: metadata@earthdata.com
Hours_of_Service: Mon-Fri 8:30 am to 5:00pm
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata_Time_Convention: local time
Metadata_Access_Constraints: None
Metadata_Use_Constraints: None

Generated by mp version 2.7.33 on Fri Apr 09 08:54:37 2004